ChatGPT
Browses live, and leans on brand familiarity
Consistent descriptions and third party coverage move it most
03 Get named when the model answers.
When somebody asks ChatGPT for a plumber in Wolverhampton or a restoration firm near Coventry, a handful of businesses get named. Generative Engine Optimisation is the work of being one of them.
Asked “who should I use for this in Wolverhampton”
Search used to be a list you could inspect. A generative answer is a recommendation, made in a conversation you cannot see, and the shortlist is already narrowed by the time your buyer reads it. Three names get mentioned. The fourth best firm in the county does not get a sentence.
Models do not rank pages, they assemble an answer from what they can find and verify about an entity. That changes what the work is. Being described consistently across the web matters more than a title tag. Being written about by somebody else matters more than writing about yourself. Having a clear, machine readable account of what you do, where you do it and what you are qualified for matters more than keyword density ever did.
This is the newest service we sell and we will be straight about it: the measurement is less mature than SEO reporting, the platforms change their behaviour without notice, and nobody can promise a position. What can be done is make you the easiest firm in your sector to describe correctly.
Four pieces of work, each one aimed at a different part of how a model decides who to name.
They are not interchangeable. One reads the live web, one leans on its index, one leans on what it was trained on, and the work differs accordingly.
Browses live, and leans on brand familiarity
Consistent descriptions and third party coverage move it most
Built on the Google index you already compete in
Conventional SEO strength carries over here more than anywhere else
Cites sources inline, and shows its working
The most measurable of the five, and the quickest to reflect new pages
Google data, with its own view of entities
Business Profile accuracy and structured data do real work here
Microsoft index, inside the tools people work in
Bing visibility and schema clarity are the lever, and both are neglected
Four stages. Nothing in stage three is worth buying until stage one has been done, and we will say so rather than invoice for it.
We ask the models the questions your buyers ask and record what comes back: whether you are named, who is named instead, and whether what is said about you is even correct.
One consistent account of who you are, what you do and where, across your site, your Business Profile, your schema and every profile that mentions you. Contradictions are what make a model hedge.
Pages that state facts a model can lift and attribute: specifications, prices, coverage, credentials, process. Plus coverage somewhere other than your own site, because self description is weighted lowest.
The same question set, monthly, with the answers kept so you can see movement. We show you the misses as plainly as the wins.
Not everyone needs this, and the ones who need it least are usually the ones being sold it hardest.
Anything people research before they buy. That research increasingly starts as a conversation rather than a search.
Trading names, a rebrand, several locations or an old Companies House entry. Models hedge when the record disagrees with itself.
If you do one thing unusually well, a model can say so, but only if your site says it plainly and somebody else confirms it.
You have the authority. The gap is usually structure and third party description, and that is a cheaper fix than it sounds.
Anything not answered here, ask it on the form. You get a person, not a sequence.
No, but it rests on SEO. A model that cannot find or verify you will not name you, so indexation, structure and credibility come first. What is genuinely different is the emphasis on entity consistency and third party description over on-page keyword work.
No. Nobody can, and anyone saying otherwise is guessing or lying. The models change, they vary by user and by phrasing, and there is no ranking to buy. What we can do is remove every reason a model would skip or misdescribe you, and measure the result honestly.
A fixed set of questions your buyers actually ask, run across the platforms that matter to you on a schedule, with the answers recorded. You see which questions name you, which name a competitor, and what changed since last month.
For most West Midlands businesses, Google AI Mode first, because it rides on the index you already compete in, then ChatGPT on volume, then Perplexity because it is the easiest to verify. We will tell you which after the audit rather than before.
Entity fixes can show up in weeks, particularly in Perplexity and anything reading the live web. Training weighted behaviour in ChatGPT is slower and less predictable. Treat six months as the honest horizon.
Often yes, and they share about half their groundwork, so they are cheaper together than separately. If budget forces a choice, we would start with whichever one your buyers actually use, and the audit tells us that.
We will run your five most commercially important questions across the major platforms and send you the raw answers, including the ones that name somebody else. No charge and no obligation.
We have opened your email app with the answers already written out. Press send in there and it reaches us.
Nothing opened? Copy the details below into an email to info@nwestradigital.co.uk, or call 07403 641273.